This really is supposed to be the "head over to" powder-or darn close to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge one could handload. It can be the foundation for a great number of pet loads, but I haven't been satisfied with the outcomes.

They've carried out identically for me. Like All people else I rushed to find the more recent SC Variation but have now switched again. Preferably you want about 100% loading density. For those who have adequate situation capability to the H4831(prolonged) you will be likely improved off.

Can they be interchanged with no concerns other then employing usual load practices when switching from great deal to whole lot?

Along with the 154 grain Hornady SP during the 280, H4831 gave me great groups and excellent velocity, but Rottweil R905 incorporates a noticeably higher velocity and offers marginally far better accuracy. With Swift one hundred fifty grain Sciroccos while in the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave great precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally improved. Therefore, in each of such instances I went with An additional powder, but I would certainly hate to divest myself of the H4831.

Yup or it is not going to do the job nicely. And Because the OP incorporates a load working with Varget I might try to locate a person to trade with. May possibly think of a earn earn problem.

I've made use of H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without having difference. The only thing will be the brief Lower provides you with a bit more Room. Very good luck!gun)

You might have to help make some a lot more posts to obtain cleared to carry out PM's. As soon as h4831sc load data you get to that standing I'd article inside the classified reloading area to determine if any one is near you for just a trade.

Like reported earlier mentioned, identical things. All of that is different is the dimensions in the kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they're going to only make the SC Sooner or later. I do not know if that may be real or not but would make sense to me. I take advantage of SC simply because that may be what I present in the eight lb h4831sc load data jug and it works.

At present utilizing IMR 4831 inside a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a popular option for this caliber and yields somewhat more velocity. Aside from it becoming short Slash, h4831sc load data what on earth is the real difference in these two powders, and may I change to H4831sc?

It also goes on to declare that due to fshorter grains, that load density may very well be marginally higher.

I required somewhat additional myself so I went forward and grabbed the 8lb jug to generally be coated for a while (and also have plenty of exactly the same great deal of powder).

This is an Intense extruded propellant and provides heightened insensitivity to hot and cold temperatures.

arkansas or ohio i never ever seen a big difference other than the regular is like rolling cordwood on to the the pan.

I sawed 1 in half to discover how thick the jackets had been, they usually had been conveniently two times as thick as being a 50-grain hollow position was. Ditto for the 64-grain Ability Level, as these bullets are crafted for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know all the things I learn about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I do not know something in the least concerning the 223. I doubt that you are going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let us understand how it goes.